LORENZOS OIL :: essays papers

LORENZOS OILProject IVSTEPS 2 & 3 name 11. What is property P? Increase in brain activity2. What is the sample? The 16 boys3. What is the population? All children4. What is the inherent question? Why is there a difference in brain function amongst normal kids and kids with ADHD.5. What is not the implicit question? Do all children pay a property p?6. What type of cable? Sampling7. what did they look at? They looked at 16 children who were diagnosed with ADHD six were not.8. IQ Is there a difference in brain function between normal kids and kids with ADHD?9. NOT Do all children have a difference in brain function?SchematizationS1 6% of school children adjoin from ADHD and require medication.S2 They looked at 16 children between 8 and 13 who were diagnosed with ADHD six were not..S3 Ritalin is the drug used to treat children with hyperactive and pugnacious behavior.S4/C1 ADHD children react differently than normal kids when given RitalinS5 Children with ADHD exhibit p roblems like poor listening and poor impulse control..S6 Healthy children have a decrease in brain activity when given Ritalin.C2 Ritalin has no positive effect on behavior in healthy childrenArticle 21. What type of argument? Correlation2. What is A ? GIK treatment (glucose insulin and potassium)3. What is B? Reduction in heart attack deaths.4. Causal Mechanism? Clogged arteries5. What is the implicit question? Why does oxygen nourishment (GIK)to the heart reduce heart attack deaths?6. NOT- What caused a reduction I Heart attacks?7. Which rival explains why a and b occur together? Forward cause Rival - Those that received treatment did not have clogged arteries.The argument in the article is a correlation argument. There is a correlation between A the GIK treatment and B the reduction in heart attack deaths. The arguer believes there is a correlation because of a prior determine. This study was originally conducted in 1960. And had showed and overall reduction in heart at tack death rate by half. This study was discarded however because of poorly conducted clinical tests. These tests led many doctors to doubt that it worked. The study conducted called GIK for glucose, insulin and potassium nourishes t65he heart muscle that are deprived of oxygen straightway following a heart attack. The causal mechanism are clogged arteries that reduce the flow of oxygen to the heart.