Tuesday, May 28, 2019
LORENZOS OIL :: essays papers
LORENZOS OILProject IVSTEPS 2 & 3Article 11. What is property P? Increase in ace activity2. What is the sample? The 16 boys3. What is the population? All children4. What is the implicit question? Why is there a difference in brain function amid normal kids and kids with ADHD.5. What is not the implicit question? Do all children have a property p?6. What type of furrow? Sampling7. what did they look at? They looked at 16 children who were diagnosed with ADHD six were not.8. IQ Is there a difference in brain function between normal kids and kids with ADHD?9. not Do all children have a difference in brain function?SchematizationS1 6% of school children suffer from ADHD and require medication.S2 They looked at 16 children between 8 and 13 who were diagnosed with ADHD six were not..S3 Ritalin is the drug used to treat children with hyperactive and aggressive behavior.S4/C1 ADHD children react differently than normal kids when given RitalinS5 Children with ADHD exhibit prob lems like poor listening and poor impulse control..S6 Healthy children have a decrease in brain activity when given Ritalin.C2 Ritalin has no positive effect on behavior in healthy childrenArticle 21. What type of argument? Correlation2. What is A ? GIK treatment (glucose insulin and potassium)3. What is B? Reduction in centre attack deaths.4. Causal Mechanism? Clogged arteries5. What is the implicit question? Why does group O nourishment (GIK)to the heart reduce heart attack deaths?6. NOT- What caused a reduction I Heart attacks?7. Which rival explains why a and b occur in concert? Forward cause Rival - Those that received treatment did not have clogged arteries.The argument in the article is a correlation argument. There is a correlation between A the GIK treatment and B the reduction in heart attack deaths. The arguer believes there is a correlation because of a front study. This study was originally conducted in 1960. And had showed and overall reduction in heart att ack death rate by half. This study was discarded however because of sick conducted clinical tests. These tests led many doctors to doubt that it worked. The study conducted called GIK for glucose, insulin and potassium nourishes t65he heart muscle that are deprived of oxygen immediately following a heart attack. The causal mechanism are clogged arteries that reduce the flow of oxygen to the heart.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.